Helpdesk Video
This one's making the rounds among the staff at the OSU Valley Library. For good reason.
Hilarious.
Enjoy
« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »
This one's making the rounds among the staff at the OSU Valley Library. For good reason.
Hilarious.
Enjoy
I've written earlier about the dangers of technically-illiterate legislation, but this one's from the enforcement side, and it's just so painful to read.
Indulge me a moment while I break it down:
The school computer had an inadequate operating system, out of date ant-virus, and an inadequate firewall; the defense was not allowed to provide expert technical testimony which would have unequivocally cleared the teacher of any wrong doing.
A clueless and technically-illiterate judicial system is potentially sending an innocent person to jail.
Sentencing is March 2nd.
Yesterday Michael Chasen, President and CEO of Blackboard, published the following press release trumpeting his company's largess toward the open source and homegrown educational online learning environment community.
Dear Blackboard Community,I am writing to share some exciting news about a patent pledge Blackboard is making today to the open source and home-grown course management community. We are announcing a legally-binding, irrevocable, world-wide pledge not to assert any of our issued or pending patents related to course management systems or transaction systems against the use, development or support of any open source or home-grown course management systems.
We developed this pledge over several months with the help and dedication of various members of the e-Learning community, such as EDUCAUSE, Sakai and many Blackboard clients. We are very grateful for their time and counsel. Without such a thoughtful and collaborative process, this sort of unprecedented pledge for a company of our size might not have been possible.
"We particularly welcome the inclusion of pending patents , the clarification on the commercial support, customization, hosting or maintenance of open source systems and the worldwide nature of Blackboard's pledge. We also appreciate the willingness of Blackboard to continue with frank and direct dialogue with our two organizations and with other higher education representatives and groups to work toward addressing these problems of community concern ."
-Joint Statement of EDUCAUSE and Sakai Boards of Directors
"We wish to acknowledge the company's actions and express our appreciation to Blackboard in committing to continue to foster creativity and collaboration within the e-Learning community. Such a response can only benefit the teachers and practitioners, the learners, Blackboard, and indeed the wider e-Learning community ."
-Australasian Council on Open, Distance and E-Learning (ACODE)
As a longstanding and leading member of the e-Learning community, we understand that Blackboard plays an important role in promoting the open exchange of ideas, collaboration and innovation. This pledge symbolizes our continued commitment to that role by agreeing not to assert U.S. Patent No. 6,988,138 and many other pending patent applications as well as their international counterparts against the development, use or distribution of open source software or home-grown course management systems anywhere in the world, to the extent that such systems are not bundled with proprietary software. This pledge also extends to the commercial support, hosting, customization and maintenance of such applications.
So those using home-grown or open source systems, professors and teachers contributing to open source projects, open source initiatives, commercially developed open source add-on applications to proprietary products and vendors hosting and supporting open source applications all are covered by this pledge. In addition, we have extended the pledge to many specifically named open source initiatives within the course and learning management system space whether or not they may include proprietary elements within their applications, including Sakai, Moodle, ATutor, Bodington and Elgg.
We are very pleased to take this formal step which is part of a larger effort on our part to engage more deeply with the e-Learning community and help foster greater openness and interoperability. We believe the pledge and the collaboration that brought it about will support and promote new innovation and the free flow of ideas across the global e-Learning community.
The text of the Pledge which incorporates by reference a list of frequently asked questions, as well as the announcement press release may be found on our website at www.blackboard.com/patent. If you have any questions about the Pledge, please contact Blackboard's Chief Legal Officer, Matthew Small, at msmall@blackboard.com.
Thank you again for your continued partnership.
Sincerely,
Michael Chasen
President and CEO
Blackboard Inc.
I'm reproducing the entire press release in order to compare and contrast it with the the tandem statement made by the board of directors of Sakai and Educause, an interesting counterpoint to that of Blackboard, if for no other reason than the latter's tone is much more measured.
One might well ask oneself why these leaders in technology in higher education would take such a tone. Isn't the Blackboard pledge a good thing?
Not really. On the one hand this feels like a face-saving effort on the part of Blackboard in anticipation of possibly losing their patents, patents which they never should have been granted. On the other hand, I get the distinct impression that Sakai and Educause are participating in this because they're more than a little uncomfortable banking on our legal system coming down on the right side of this issue.
I'll say it again, I have firsthand knowledge of there being prior art. I was involved with several projects that used teacher and student roles in course management systems before Blackboard existed. Setting aside, therefore, the huge issue of whether or not software should be patentable (it shouldn't be), these patents should have never been granted.
Given this fact and the home run that the FOSS community hit with last week's ruling, it's highly likely that Blackboard will be facing patent setbacks. So Sakai and Educause can afford to take a sterner tone. It seems to me as if they're just hedging their bets by participating in joint release.
To my mind they seem to be joining in this Blackboard public relations effort just in case Blackboard prevails and maintains their patents. Meanwhile, Blackboard gets to say to higher education, "Don't worry. We're not after you. We play nice. You can trust us. We're only after those who, like us, want to make a profit off of education, those, who--like us--have more mundane and less idealistic motives for being interested in education."
It will be interesting to see what Sakai and Educause will say when (and if) Blackboard's patents are revoked.